ABSTRACT
This paper provides an assessment of the skills needed for entry-level logistics professionals in Bangladesh's apparel industry and suggests the critical skill areas that require improvement. Two studies were conducted to get the responses from supply chain and logistics professionals who have direct interactions with entry-level logistics professionals in the workplace. In study 1, an Importance-Expertise Matrix (IEM) analysis was conducted to provide an assessment of the relative importance and expertise of 40 skill items and investigate the skill gaps. The results reveal that 27.5% of the skill items have a noticeable gap between their importance and expertise level, indicating further improvement is needed. In Study 2, a qualitative approach was used, and the findings reinforced those of Study 1 and offered new and important information about skill and knowledge requirements amid the COVID-19 pandemic. This research offers implications for the apparel industry, academia, policymakers, and training agencies in Bangladesh.
ABSTRACT
Background: Fever is a common clinical manifestation of COVID-19 infection. Fever has also been associated with unmasking Brugada pattern ECG in patients and may result in life-threatening arrhythmia. Little is known regarding COVID-19 associated Brugada pattern ECG. There is paucity of data and guidance in how to manage these patients. Method(s): To identify all published case reports, the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was followed. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus through September 2021. A systematic review was performed to identify the incidence, clinical characteristics, and management outcomes of COVID-19 patients with a Brugada pattern ECG. Result(s): A total of 18 cases were collected. The mean age was 47.1 years and 11.1% were women. No patient had prior confirmed diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. The most common presenting clinical symptoms were fever (83.3%), chest pain (38.8%), shortness of breath (38.8%), and syncope (16.6%). All 18 patients presented with type 1 Brugada pattern ECG. Four patients (22.2%) underwent left heart catheterization, and none demonstrated the presence of obstructive coronary disease. The most common reported therapies included antipyretics (55.5%), hydroxychloroquine (27.7%), and antibiotics (16.6%). One patient (5.5%) died during hospitalization. Three patients (16.6%) who presented with syncope received either an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or wearable cardioverter defibrillator at discharge. At follow up, thirteen patients (72.2%) had resolution of type 1 Brugada pattern ECG. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 associated Brugada pattern ECG is rare. Most patients may see resolution of the ECG pattern once their symptoms have improved. Increased awareness and timely use of antipyretics is warranted in this population.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many research studies were adapted, including our longitudinal study examining cognitive impairment (CI) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Cognitive testing was switched from in-person to virtual. This analysis aimed to determine if the administration method (in-person vs. virtual) of the ACR-neuropsychological battery (ACR-NB) affected participant cognitive performance and classification. METHODS: Data from our multi-visit, SLE CI study included demographic, clinical, and psychiatric characteristics, and the modified ACR-NB. Three analyses were undertaken for cognitive performance: (1) all visits, (2) non-CI group visits only and (3) intra-individual comparisons. A retrospective preferences questionnaire was given to participants who completed the ACR-NB both in-person and virtually. RESULTS: We analysed 328 SLE participants who had 801 visits (696 in-person and 105 virtual). Demographic, clinical, and psychiatric characteristics were comparable except for ethnicity, anxiety and disease-related damage. Across all three comparisons, six tests were consistently statistically significantly different. CI classification changed in 11/71 (15%) participants. 45% of participants preferred the virtual administration method and 33% preferred in-person. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 19 tests in the ACR-NB, we identified one or more problems with eight (42%) tests when moving from in-person to virtual administration. As the use of virtual cognitive testing will likely increase, these issues need to be addressed - potentially by validating a virtual version of the ACR-NB. Until then, caution must be taken when directly comparing virtual to in-person test results. If future studies use a mixed administration approach, this should be accounted for during analysis.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Rheumatology , Humans , United States , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/complications , CognitionABSTRACT
Background: Corticosteroids are standard of care for moderate-to-severe COVID-19. However, the optimal dosing is unclear. Our objective was to compare higher dose corticosteroids to lower dose corticosteroids in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. Method(s): We searched for randomized trials of adult patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 that compared corticosteroids versus placebo, standard care or that compared alternative doses of corticosteroids. We performed both a frequentist network and dose-response meta-analysis. We assessed risk of bias using a modified version of the Cochrane RoB 2.0 and used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. Result(s): We included 21 randomized trials with 9,640 patients. Our dose response analysis found that higher dose corticosteroids probably reduce mortality compared to lower dose (risk difference 13 fewer deaths per 1000 (95% CI 22.6 to 3.92 fewer);moderate certainty), may decrease the need of mechanical ventilation dose (risk difference 10 fewer per 1000 (95% CI 20.5 to 4.8 fewer) and probably decreases risk of infections (16.7 fewer infections per 1000 (95% CI 25 to 5.4 fewer);moderate certainty). Our network meta-analysis found that high dose corticosteroids probably reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation as compared to low dose (6.9 fewer days (95% CI 8.5 to 5.2 fewer);moderate certainty). The results of our network and dose response analysis were consistent. Conclusion(s): High dose corticosteroids is more effective than than low dose in reducing mortality.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To study the effect of low-to-moderate dose glucocorticoid therapy on viral clearance in patients with COVID-19. Methods: A total of 72 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from January 19 to February 17, 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were recruited. All patients received oral arbidol and combination of lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/cobistitat for antiviral therapy, and symptomatic supportive care. Among them, 51 patients received methylprednisolone (0.75-1.50 mg.kg-1.d-1) (glucocorticoid treatment group), and 21 patients did not use glucocorticoid (control group). The time of virologic negative conversion in sputum and the time of radiologic recovery in lung since onset were compared between the two groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test or Fisher exact test was used to compare the difference between groups. Results: The median ages of the glucocorticoid group and the control group were 52 (45, 62) and 46 (32, 56) years (chi2=4.365, P<0.05). The clinical conditions at hospital admission were different between the two groups (P<0.01). The severe cases accounted for 52.0%, while moderate cases in the control group accounted for 71.4%. The median times from the onset to virologic negative conversion in the two groups were 15 (13, 20) and 14 (12, 20) days (P>0.05). The median times from onset to radiologic recovery were 13 (11, 15) and 13 (12, 17) days in the two groups (P>0.05). In moderate cases, the median times from the onset to virologic conversion in sputum were 13 (11, 18) days in the glucocorticoid group and 13 (12, 15) days in the control group (P>0.05). The median times from onset to radiologic recovery in lung were 12 (10, 15) and 13 (12, 17) days, respectively (P>0.05). Conclusion(s): Low-to-moderate glucocorticoid treatment has no effect on the time of virus clearance in patients with different clinical types of COVID-19, and also no effect on accelerating radiologic recovery in lung, so it is not recommended.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To study the effect of low-to-moderate dose glucocorticoid therapy on viral clearance in patients with COVID-19. Methods: A total of 72 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from January 19 to February 17, 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were recruited. All patients received oral arbidol and combination of lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/cobistitat for antiviral therapy, and symptomatic supportive care. Among them, 51 patients received methylprednisolone (0.75-1.50 mg.kg-1.d-1) (glucocorticoid treatment group), and 21 patients did not use glucocorticoid (control group). The time of virologic negative conversion in sputum and the time of radiologic recovery in lung since onset were compared between the two groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test or Fisher exact test was used to compare the difference between groups. Results: The median ages of the glucocorticoid group and the control group were 52 (45, 62) and 46 (32, 56) years (chi2=4.365, P<0.05). The clinical conditions at hospital admission were different between the two groups (P<0.01). The severe cases accounted for 52.0%, while moderate cases in the control group accounted for 71.4%. The median times from the onset to virologic negative conversion in the two groups were 15 (13, 20) and 14 (12, 20) days (P>0.05). The median times from onset to radiologic recovery were 13 (11, 15) and 13 (12, 17) days in the two groups (P>0.05). In moderate cases, the median times from the onset to virologic conversion in sputum were 13 (11, 18) days in the glucocorticoid group and 13 (12, 15) days in the control group (P>0.05). The median times from onset to radiologic recovery in lung were 12 (10, 15) and 13 (12, 17) days, respectively (P>0.05). Conclusion(s): Low-to-moderate glucocorticoid treatment has no effect on the time of virus clearance in patients with different clinical types of COVID-19, and also no effect on accelerating radiologic recovery in lung, so it is not recommended.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To study the effect of low-to-moderate dose glucocorticoid therapy on viral clearance in patients with COVID-19. Methods: A total of 72 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from January 19 to February 17, 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were recruited. All patients received oral arbidol and combination of lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/cobistitat for antiviral therapy, and symptomatic supportive care. Among them, 51 patients received methylprednisolone (0.75-1.50 mg.kg-1.d-1) (glucocorticoid treatment group), and 21 patients did not use glucocorticoid (control group). The time of virologic negative conversion in sputum and the time of radiologic recovery in lung since onset were compared between the two groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test or Fisher exact test was used to compare the difference between groups. Results: The median ages of the glucocorticoid group and the control group were 52 (45, 62) and 46 (32, 56) years (chi2=4.365, P<0.05). The clinical conditions at hospital admission were different between the two groups (P<0.01). The severe cases accounted for 52.0%, while moderate cases in the control group accounted for 71.4%. The median times from the onset to virologic negative conversion in the two groups were 15 (13, 20) and 14 (12, 20) days (P>0.05). The median times from onset to radiologic recovery were 13 (11, 15) and 13 (12, 17) days in the two groups (P>0.05). In moderate cases, the median times from the onset to virologic conversion in sputum were 13 (11, 18) days in the glucocorticoid group and 13 (12, 15) days in the control group (P>0.05). The median times from onset to radiologic recovery in lung were 12 (10, 15) and 13 (12, 17) days, respectively (P>0.05). Conclusion(s): Low-to-moderate glucocorticoid treatment has no effect on the time of virus clearance in patients with different clinical types of COVID-19, and also no effect on accelerating radiologic recovery in lung, so it is not recommended.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Coronaviruses (CoVs) are the largest positive-strand RNA viruses discovered, with high variability and high infectivity. There are seven kinds of CoVs that can infect humans so far. Among them, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2003, middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012 and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 2019 have caused global outbreaks, posing a serious threat to global public health security. Research on CoVs infection has never stopped, and the current treatment methods mainly focus on improving symptoms. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has a long history and rich experience in preventing and treating various diseases. In terms of anti-CoVs, TCM has attracted much attention because of its multi-CoVs and multi-targets, significant antiviral effect and few side effect. TCM extracts or their compounds can exert anti-CoVs effects by directly or indirectly inhibiting the invasion, replication, assembly of CoVs, regulating immunity and inhibiting inflammation. This article systematically reviews the mechanism and clinical application of TCM in anti-CoVs and alleviating virus-induced symptoms, in order to provide theoretical reference for the research and development of anti-coronavirus drugs. © 2023 Editorial Office of Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
This article reviews the relevant studies on the efficacy and safety of influenza, pneumococcal and COVID-19 vaccination among tumor patients worldwide in recent years. By combing and analyzing the retrieved literature, the results show that influenza and pneumococcal vaccination can significantly reduce the morbidity and hospitalization rate of infectious diseases in tumor patients, reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and death, and significantly improve survival prognosis. COVID-19 vaccination can also protect tumor patients, especially those who have completed full dose vaccination. Authoritative guidelines and consensuses worldwide all recommend that tumor patients receive influenza, pneumococcal and COVID-19 vaccines. We should carry out relevant researches, as well as take effective measures to strengthen patient education, so that tumor patients can fully experience the health protection brought by the vaccine to this specific group.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Neoplasms , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Vaccination , Pneumococcal Vaccines/therapeutic use , Streptococcus pneumoniaeABSTRACT
Coronaviruses (CoVs) are the largest positive-strand RNA viruses discovered, with high variability and high infectivity. There are seven kinds of CoVs that can infect humans so far. Among them, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2003, middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012 and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 2019 have caused global outbreaks, posing a serious threat to global public health security. Research on CoVs infection has never stopped, and the current treatment methods mainly focus on improving symptoms. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has a long history and rich experience in preventing and treating various diseases. In terms of anti-CoVs, TCM has attracted much attention because of its multi-CoVs and multi-targets, significant antiviral effect and few side effect. TCM extracts or their compounds can exert anti-CoVs effects by directly or indirectly inhibiting the invasion, replication, assembly of CoVs, regulating immunity and inhibiting inflammation. This article systematically reviews the mechanism and clinical application of TCM in anti-CoVs and alleviating virus-induced symptoms, in order to provide theoretical reference for the research and development of anti-coronavirus drugs. Copyright © 2023 Editorial Office of Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Numerous studies links movement activity (e.g., physical activity, sedentary behavior [SB], and sleep) with mental health or illness indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic;however, research has typically examined time-use behaviors independently, rather than considering daily activity as a 24-hour time-use composition. This cross-sectional study aimed to use compositional isotemporal analysis to estimate the association between reallocation of time-use behaviors and depression symptoms in young adults in China. Participants (n = 1475;68.0% of female;20.7 [1.60] years) reported their time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light physical activity (LPA), SB, and sleep. Replacing SB with sleep, LPA, and MVPA at 5, 10, or 15 min was significantly associated with lower estimated depression symptoms scores. For example, adding MVPA from SB at 15 min was associated with lower depression symptoms scores (estimated difference: -0.13 [-0.17, -0.09]). The associations between reallocation of time use behaviors with depression symptoms scores were slightly differentiated. Our results emphasize the importance of increased MVPA and decreased SB as well as their mutual replacements for lowering the risks of depression symptoms in young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results can inform policy to develop effective plans and strategies for mental health promotion.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on the global textile and apparel supply chain from the perspectives of industry professionals within the two leading production countries: Bangladesh and China. Design/methodology/approach: Applying the theory of dynamic capabilities, a qualitative research design was employed using interviews with a total of 33 apparel industry practitioners, 15 in Bangladesh and 18 in China. Findings: Findings indicate that four factors primarily impacted the extent to which COVID-19 disrupted a firm's supply chain: firm size, channel diversification, sourcing method and product type. Viewed through the lens of the theory of dynamic capabilities, findings point to the need for firms to address the challenges brought about by supply chain disruptions by creating opportunities. Originality/value: It is important to understand the impact of COVID-19 in real time and within the two largest textile and apparel–producing countries globally, as they have borne much of the brunt of the supply chain disruptions brought on by COVID-19. This empirical study makes contributions to the apparel supply chain literature as it provides an in-depth investigation of what textile and apparel firms in China and Bangladesh have learned from the COVID-19 experience to better prepare for future unexpected global events. © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.
ABSTRACT
Objective To understand the contaminations of SARS-CoV-2 of imported frozen food and corresponding ke;environments in Nantong Farmers’ Wholesale Market. Methods The samples of imported frozen food, surface samples of key environmental objects and throat swabs, anal swabs and blood samples from employees were collected randomly, SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing as well as specific serum antibody IgM and IgG testing were implemented. Results A total of 1 685 sample: of imported frozen food in Nantong, 2 432 samples from key environment, and 1 539 samples of anal swabs and throat swabs fron key practitioners were collected, all samples were confirmed to be negative for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing. A total of 299 blood samples were collected from key employees, and virus specific serum antibodies IgM and IgG were negative. Conclusion The imported frozen food and key environment sold in the Nantong have not been contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 temporarily, and it remains being necessary to further implements surveillance and control of Corona Virus Disease 2019(COVID-19). © 2022, Editorial Department of Medical Pest Control. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background There were many hypertensive patients at non-high risk of developing COVID-19 that needed to be medical observation at home, but the changes in their blood pressure and measurement frequency as well as heart rate during the period are still unclear. Objective To perform an analysis of the changes in blood pressure and measurement frequency as well as heart rate in hypertensive patients that needed to be medical observation at home. Methods Through the iHealth cloud platform, data〔including age, sex, systolic blood pressure（SBP） and diastolic blood pressure（DBP）measured by the iHealth Clear （BPM1） at home, and heart rate〕were collected from December 1st, 2019 to March 27th, 2020, involving all hypertensive patients in Wuhan who had an ID number for consecutively uploading blood pressure readings, and were desensitized for removing the confidential information. The features of blood pressure during the period were analyzed. ARIMAX model was used to assess the association of age, sex, number of confirmed COVID-19 cases per day, cumulative confirmed COVID-19 deaths, time granularity and the traffic control with participants' blood pressure and hear rates. Results In total, blood pressure readings of 36 472 measurements by the participants using 1 232 iHealth Clear （BPM1） were collected during the 118-day period. Men demonstrated higher mean SBP, DBP and heart rate than women（P<0.05）. After January 23, 2020, the mean SBP of the participants decreased from （141±19）mm Hg to （138±18）mm Hg（P<0.05）. The analysis using the ARIMAX model revealed that after adjusting for month, week, age and number of confirmed COVID-19 cases per day, male participants showed a decrease in blood pressure（βSBP=-1.08×10-3, P=0.028, βDBP=-6.35×10-4, P=0.002）, and an increase in heart rate （βHR=2.02, P=0.003）and measurement frequency （βtimes=0.035, P=0.002）. But no significant changes were seen in females（P<0.05）. Conclusion In general, among hypertensive patients that needed to be medical observation at home, males were found with higher mean SBP, DBP, heart rate and blood pressure measurement frequency. And these hypertensive patients were found with decreased SBP and DBP after the implementation of traffic control. Using the Internet to store blood pressure data measured by the home blood pressure monitor for data assessment and treatment, is contribute to out-of-hospital management of blood pressure in hypertensive patients, which demonstrates the significance of Internet in combination with healthcare. © 2022 Chinese General Practice. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
We virtually screen for effective COVID-19 drugs and test their ability to prevent binding of SARS-CoV-2 and two variants to hACE2 receptors using microtoroids. Three drugs were found to have picomolar inhibitory constants. © Optica Publishing Group 2022, © 2022 The Author(s)
ABSTRACT
Background: Comprehensive real-world evidence of the virulence of COVID-19 Omicron, Delta, and Alpha variants as well as the effectiveness of booster vaccinations in patients with cancer are lacking. We aimed to fill in these gaps for cancer patients and provide essential insights on the management of the fast-evolving pandemic by leveraging the nationally-representative electronic medical records from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) registry. Methods: The virulence of COVID-19 variants was examined according to severe outcomes of infected patients with cancer, compared with non-cancer patients, using the N3C data between 12/01/2020 and 02/03/2022. Variants were inferred according to the time periods of variant dominance at > 95% accuracy. The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 variants, adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, geographic regions, vaccination status, cancer types, smoking status, cancer treatments, and adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results: Our study cohort included 114,195 COVID-19 patients with cancer and 160,493 without cancer as control. Among them, 52,539 (21%) were infected by Omicron, 82,579 (33%) by Delta, and 115,200 (46%) by Alpha variants. Prior to the COVID-19 breakthrough infection, 7%, 22%, 3%, and 69% were vaccinated with 1 dose, 2 doses, a booster, or unvaccinated respectively. The proportions of hospitalization and death among patients with vs without cancer were 40% and 7% vs 18% and 0.4%, respectively. Characteristics of the cancer subcohort are summarized in the Table. Our analysis showed dramatically lower risks of severe outcomes for patients who were infected by Omicron (HR 0.42, 95%CI: 0.38 - 0.46) and slightly lower risks for Delta (HR 0.93, 95%CI: 0.89 - 0.98) compared with those infected by Alpha, after adjusting for other demographic clinical risk factors, and vaccination status. This trend remained similar in subgroups of patients with solid tumors, hematologic malignancies, or without cancer. Similar associations were observed when virulence was evaluated in association with mortality. The effectiveness of booster vaccinations varied across sub-cohorts stratified by variants and cancer types. Booster shots reduced the risk of severe outcomes for patients with solid tumors infected by Omicron variant or hematologic malignancies infected by Delta variants. Conclusions: Our work provides up-to-date and comprehensive real-world evidence of the virulence of COVID-19 variants in patients with cancer. Omicron variant showed significantly reduced virulence for different cancer types.
ABSTRACT
Background: Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 or long COVID, is characterized by persistence of symptoms and/or emergence of new symptoms post COVID-19 infection. As evidence accumulates and national initiatives arise to address this increasingly prevalent syndrome, characterization of specific patient groups is still lacking including patients with cancer. Using a nationally representative sample of over 4.3M COVID-19 patients from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), we aim to describe characteristics of patients with cancer and long COVID. Methods: We employed two approaches to identify long COVID patients within N3C: i) patients presenting to a long COVID clinic at four N3C sites and ii) patients diagnosed using the recently introduced ICD-10 code: U09.9 Post COVID- 19 condition, unspecified. We included patients with at least one positive COVID-19 diagnosis between 1/1/2020 and 2/3/2022. Patients had to survive at least 90 days from the date of their COVID- 19 diagnosis. Analyses were performed in the N3C Data Enclave on the Palantir platform. Results: A total of 1700 adult patients with long COVID were identified from the N3C cohort;634 (37.3%) were cancer patients and 1066 were non-cancer controls. The most common represented cancers were skin (21.9%), breast (17.7%), prostate (8.3%), lymphoma (8.0%) and leukemia (5.7%). Median age of long-COVID cancer patients was 64 years (Interquartile Range: 54-72), 48.6% were 65 years or older, 60.4% females, 76.8% non-Hispanic White, 12.3% were Black, and 3% Hispanic. A total of 41.1% were current or former smokers, 27.7% had an adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 0, 18.6% score of 1 and 11.2% score of 2. A total of 57.2% were hospitalized for their initial COVID-19 infection, the average length of stay in the hospital was 9.6 days (SD: 16.7 days), 9.1% required invasive ventilation, and 13% had acute kidney injury during hospitalization. The most common diagnosis among the non-cancer long COVID patients was asthma (26%), diabetes (17%), chronic kidney disease (12%), heart failure (9.4%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (7.8%). Among long COVID patients, compared to non-cancer controls, cancer patients were more likely to be older (OR = 2.4, 95%CI: 1.1-5.4, p = 0.03), have comorbidities (OR = 4.3, 95%CI: 2.9-6.2, p < 0.0001), and to be hospitalized for COVID-19 (OR = 1.3, 95%CI: 1.0-1.7, p = 0.05), adjusting for sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index and smoking history. Conclusions: In a nationally representative sample of long COVID patients, there was a relative overrepresentation of patients with cancer. Compared to non-cancer controls, cancer patients were older, more likely to have more comorbidities and to be hospitalized for COVID-19 warranting further investigation to identify risk factors for long COVID in patients with cancer.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM), an age-dependent neoplasm of antibody-producing plasma cells, have compromised immune systems due to multiple factors that may increase the risk of severe COVID-19. The NCATS' National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is a centralized data resource representing the largest multi-center cohort of ∼12M COVID-19 cases and controls nationwide. In this study, we aim to analyze risk factors associated with COVID-19 severity and death in MM patients using the N3C database. Methods: Our cohort included MM patients within the N3C registry diagnosed with COVID-19 based on positive PCR or antigen tests or ICD-10-CM. The outcomes of interest include all-cause mortality (including discharge to hospice) during the index encounter, and clinical indicators of severity (hospitalization/ED visit, use of mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/ECMO). Results: As of 09/10/2021, the N3C registry included 690371 cancer patients, out of which 17791 were MM patients (4707 were COVID-19+). The mean age at diagnosis was 65.9yrs, 57.6% were >65yo, 46.4% were females, and 21.8% were Blacks. 25.6% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score of ≥2. 55.6% required an inpatient or ED visit, and 3.65% required invasive ventilation. 11.4% developed acute kidney injury during hospitalization. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed histories of pulmonary disease (OR 2.2;95%CI: 1.7-2.8), renal disease (OR 1.8;95%CI: 1.4-2.4), and black race (p<0.001) were associated with higher risk of severity. Interestingly, smoking status was significantly associated with a lower risk of severity (OR 0.7;95%CI: 0.5-0.9). Further, protective association was also observed between COVID-19 severity and blood or marrow transplant (BMT) (OR 0.52;95%CI: 0.4-0.7), daratumumab therapy (OR 0.64;95%CI: 0.42- 0.99) and COVID-19 vaccination (OR 0.28;95%CI: 0.18-0.44). IMiDs were associated increase in the risk of COVID-19 severity (OR 2.1;95%CI: 1.6-2.7). 2.3% of N3C-myeloma COVID-19+ patients died within the first 10 days, while 4.95% died within 30 days of COVID-19 hospitalization. Overall, the survival probability was 90.5% across the course of the study. Multivariate cox proportional hazard model showed that CCI score ≥2 (HR 4.4;95%CI: 2.2-8.8), hypertension (HR 1.6;95%CI: 1.02- 2.4), IMiD (HR 2.6;95%CI: 1.8-3.8) and proteasome inhibitor (HR 1.6;95%CI: 1.1-2.5) therapy were associated with worse survival. COVID-19 vaccination (HR 0.195;95%CI: 0.09-0.45) and BMT (HR 0.65;95%CI: 0.4-0.995) were associated with lower risk of death. Conclusions: We have identified previously unpublished potential risk factors for COVID-19 severity and death in MM as well as validated some published ones. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest nationwide study on multiple myeloma patients with COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) can reduce disease incidence and severity. Dialysis patients demonstrate a delayed immunologic response to vaccines. We determined factors affecting the immunologic response to COVID-19 vaccines in hemodialysis patients. METHOD: All patients within a Swedish hemodialysis network, vaccinated with two doses of COVID-19 vaccine 2-8 weeks before inclusion, were eligible for this cross-sectional study. Severe adult respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein antibody levels were determined by the EliA SARS-CoV-2-Sp1 IgG test (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Phadia AB) and related to clinical and demographic parameters. Eighty-nine patients were included. RESULTS: Patients were vaccinated with two doses of Comirnaty (BNT162b2, 73%) or Spikevax (mRNA-1273, 23.6%). Three patients received combinations of different vaccines. Response rate (antibody titres >7 U/mL) was 89.9%, while 39.3% developed high antibody titres (>204 U/mL), 47 (43-50) days after the second dose. A previous COVID-19 infection associated with higher antibody titres [median (25th-75th percentile) 1558.5 (814.5-3763.8) U/mL versus 87 (26-268) U/mL;P = 0.002], while the time between vaccine doses did not differ between groups (P = 0.7). Increasing SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres were independently associated with increasing time between vaccine doses, decreasing serum calcium levels and previous COVID-19 (Table 1). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a longer interval between COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses, lower calcium and a previous COVID-19 infection were independently associated with a stronger immunologic vaccination response in hemodialysis patients. While the response rate was good, only a minority developed high antibody titres 47 (43-50) days after the second vaccine dose. (Table Presented).